Meet new operational resilience requirements with software escrow
Your critical software dependencies have become your greatest operational risk.
And now, regulators hold you accountable for these vulnerabilities.
Without proper controls, you risk non-compliance penalties, business disruption, and reputation damage.
These regulations are coming for your vendor risks
International standards demand documented business continuity procedures, including measures to protect against third-party vendor failures and maintain access to critical software systems.
Global standards require organizations to prove their ability to maintain operations during disruption, with verifiable continuity and recovery measures for critical software dependencies.
Compliance audits require demonstrable oversight and control effectiveness across all software subservice organizations supporting your operations.
New EU cybersecurity law imposes operational continuity requirements on all connected products sold in Europe, effective December 2027.
EU regulators mandate continuous monitoring of software supply chains with mandatory breach reporting when vendors compromise your systems.
EU regulators demand documented proof that your IT systems can survive vendor failures and cyber incidents affecting your supply chain.
US banking regulators expect comprehensive vendor oversight with tested contingency plans for every mission-critical software dependency.
Australian financial regulators now hold you accountable for maintaining operations when your critical software vendors go out of business.
ESMA's new third-party risk supervision principles give supervisors explicit grounds to intervene when firms lack concrete exit strategies or become "empty shells" dependent on external providers.
Healthcare regulations impose strict security controls and breach notification requirements for any software applications handling protected health information.
Data protection regulations extend your personal liability to include security failures and data breaches by any software vendors processing personal data on your behalf.
Enterprise risk management frameworks require disciplined, repeatable processes that minimise disruption and support stable, predictable performance across key operations.
Let us help turn your software risk into operational resilience
That's exactly what we provide: A clear path to operational resilience that satisfies regulators, protects your operations, and removes the constant worry about vendor failures.
How software escrow builds software resilience
(99.9% uptime, MTBF metrics, failover systems)
(vendor assessment, API dependency tracking)
(BCP testing, failover plans, tolerance levels)
(immutable backups, RPO/RTO controls)
How to close software resilience gaps with Codekeeper
Assess your software risk
Take our free risk assessment to identify which applications require escrow protection under DORA, NIS2, and other frameworks.
Secure critical assets
We'll escrow your highest-risk applications with legal agreements, automated synchronization, and verification checks.
Demonstrate compliance
You get Software Resilience Certificates for each secured application to prove your compliance under all major frameworks.
Build your compliance proof on tested recovery
Prove your exit strategy recovers
- Exit strategy tested for each critical ICT provider
- Evidence aligned to your Register of Information entry
- Retesting scheduled around your review deadlines
Back supplier resilience with tested proof
- Recovery proven for the software your suppliers control
- Each direct supplier relationship documented for the record
- Signed continuity records replace scattered supplier correspondence
Keep your ISO 27001 certificate valid
- Recovery timed against your business impact analysis targets
- Line-by-line evidence mapped to control A.5.30
- Retesting that holds up between surveillance audits
Clear CC9 without stalling the report
- Vendor continuity verified for each subservice organization
- Each record cited to the CC9 criterion it satisfies
- Evidence that holds across a Type II observation period
Close the recovery gap before the exam
- Recovery mapped to the NIST CSF 2.0 Recover function
- Records tied to the IT Handbook booklets examiners work from
- Evidence scheduled to stay current ahead of every exam cycle